India
MCM partners for Indian publishers — the honest picture
Most "best ad network" lists are written for American blogs. If your traffic is Indian, more than half the names on them will not take you — and the reason usually isn't your size. Google MCM (Multiple Customer Management) is the Google Ad Manager feature that lets an approved partner manage a publisher's ad inventory, or its whole Ad Manager account, and bring it Google Ad Exchange (AdX) demand.
By Umashankar Kushwah · Published 26 August 2026 · Updated 15 September 2026
1. The India problem
The common belief is that the big US networks are out of reach because their traffic bar is too high. That isn't what their own pages say. Raptive lists its requirement as 25,000 pageviews a month — a bar plenty of Indian sites clear comfortably.
The line underneath it is the one that matters:
"The majority of your traffic comes from the United States, Canada,
the United Kingdom, Australia, or New Zealand"
That is a geographic requirement, not a volume one. An Indian publisher doing 500,000 pageviews a month fails it just as completely as one doing 5,000. There is no amount of growth that fixes it.
So the real position for a 50k–200k pageview Indian publisher is this: AdSense works and pays, the next tier up is closed for reasons you cannot change, and nobody tells you which doors are actually open.
2. Who is actually present in India
I read the ads.txt file of 123 Indian publisher sites — national news,
regional language, tech, sport, entertainment — and counted which management partners
appear with a DIRECT relationship. DIRECT matters: a RESELLER line only means
inventory reaches them through somebody else, not that they manage anything.
| Partner | Indian sites, DIRECT | Also seen as RESELLER |
|---|---|---|
| AdWMG | 66 | 45 |
| AniView | 40 | 81 |
| AdPushup | 33 | 0 |
| Primis | 24 | 0 |
| MonetizeMore | 18 | 0 |
| Adnimation | 17 | 4 |
| OptAd360 | 12 | 0 |
| Setupad | 11 | 0 |
| Clickio | 9 | 0 |
| Venatus | 8 | 8 |
AniView is worth reading carefully — 81 of its appearances are RESELLER lines. It is a video ad server reaching sites through other platforms, not a management partner for most of them.
And the ones that were on zero Indian sites
Across all 123 files, these did not appear once — not DIRECT, not RESELLER:
ezoic.com · snigel.com
newormedia.com · sulvo.com
(AdThrive is Raptive's former brand name — listed
separately here because the domain is still in use,
but it is the same company. Seven domains, six companies.)
This is a sample of 123 sites, not a census — absence here means "not found in this sample", not "never works with anyone in India". But when seven well-known names appear zero times in a sample that size, the pattern is doing the talking.
Three of those seven — Mediavine, Ezoic and Raptive — are Google Premier certified partners. The issue is not credibility, it's that their geography requirements exclude Indian traffic.
Corrected 26 Aug 2026: an earlier version of this list included Freestar. That was a
scanning error on my side — I had searched for freestar.io, and their
registered domain is freestar.com. Rescanned properly, Freestar appears on
11 of the 123 Indian sites (3 DIRECT, 8 RESELLER), so it does not belong in this list.
3. Realistic eCPM for Indian traffic
The $10 and $35 CPM figures that circulate in this niche are real numbers — for Tier-1 video inventory. They are not your numbers, and any partner quoting them at you for Indian display traffic is either careless or selling.
Display inventory on majority-Indian traffic sits at the lower end of the $1–5 band. I am not going to give you a tighter figure than that, because a tighter figure would be made up. What I can tell you is what moves you inside that band:
Category. Finance, insurance and tech pull materially higher than entertainment or general news.
Geo mix. Even 10–15% US/UK traffic changes the blended number noticeably.
Device split. Desktop still monetises better than mobile web on most Indian inventory.
Viewability. The single biggest lever most publishers haven't touched.
Ad layout. Fewer, better-placed units usually beat more units.
Anyone who guarantees you a specific eCPM before seeing a month of your data is guessing. Ask them what they think it will be, then ask what they'd do if they're wrong.
4. The reporting question nobody asks
Every company reselling Google demand publishes a sellers.json file listing
the publishers it represents. You can check, before signing anything, whether that partner
gives publishers their own account or puts them behind a shared one.
How to check it yourself, in about a minute:
| Step | What to do |
|---|---|
| 1 | Open https://[partner-domain]/sellers.json in a browser. |
| 2 | Count entries where seller_type is PUBLISHER. |
| 3 | Count how many distinct seller_id values those entries use. |
| 4 | Divide: distinct IDs ÷ publisher domains. |
Close to 1.00 means one account per publisher — your numbers are yours, and another publisher's problem is less likely to become your problem. Far below, around 0.2, means many publishers sit behind a small number of shared IDs. That model is not fraud and it can pay perfectly well, but it changes what your reporting can show you and what a policy issue elsewhere on that ID does to you.
I ran this for every partner I could reach. The ratios, publisher counts and geography are in the MCM partners directory — including the ones whose files I couldn't read, which are listed as unmeasured rather than guessed at.
If you would rather start from your own site type than from the full list, the segment-by-segment read is here: best MCM partners by segment.
5. What I offer
| Delegation | Manage Inventory by default. I never ask for Manage Account access. |
| Reporting | Per-site, monthly — impressions, eCPM, fill rate. |
| Payment | Revenue share. Nothing upfront, at any point. |
| Lock-in | None. No exclusivity clause. |
| Guarantees | None — approval is Google's policy review, not mine. |
| Screening | Before onboarding. If your site won't pass, I tell you at the start. |
Disclosure: I'm one of the options here. I run an MCM operation, so this
page is a competitor writing about competitors — which is exactly why every number on it
is tied to a file you can open yourself: their sellers.json, their
requirements page, or an ads.txt you can read in a browser. I'm not a Google
Certified Publishing Partner and I don't claim to be; I work through established parent
networks and will name the one for your site before you commit.
Before you talk to me or anyone else, the seven questions worth asking any partner are here: what to ask an MCM partner before you sign. Ask me the same seven.
Start with whether your site qualifies
If it won't pass Google's policy review, no partner on this page can change that. The check takes a minute and tells you where you stand.